понедельник, 24 сентября 2012 г.

SENS. MURRAY, BURR ASK VA INSPECTOR GENERAL TO LAUNCH INVESTIGATION INTO MENTAL HEALTH CARE WAIT TIMES. - States News Service

WASHINGTON -- The following information was released by North Carolina Senator Richard Burr:

Today, U.S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) and Richard Burr (R-NC), the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, asked the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Inspector General to begin a formal audit of mental health care wait times at the VA. The call for action comes after a series of Senate hearings raised questions around the time it takes for veterans to receive an initial appointment and whether VA facilities are accurately reporting mental health care accessibility.

'We write to request that your office conduct an audit of how accurately wait times for mental health services are recorded for both the initial visits and the follow-up appointments and determine if wait time data VA collects represent an accurate depiction of veterans' ability to access those services,' the Senators wrote. 'In addition, we ask that your office evaluate whether VA is accurately and completely reporting the data they collect.'

The Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee has held two hearings this year on VA mental health accessibility. At the first hearing on July 14th the Committee heard the first-hand stories of two service members, who even after attempting to take their own lives, had appointments postponed and difficulties cutting through the red tape in order to get care. Then, just last week, the Committee heard from a VA psychologist and mental health care coordinator who testified about delays in providing mental health care treatment, including care for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). That hearing also raised questions on whether VA providers where using techniques to ensure initial mental health care appointments fall within the VA's required 14 day window, without providing true access to care at those appointments. A survey of VA mental health providers requested by Senator Murray showed dramatically different results from the waiting time data that VA reports.

Senator Murray also called VA's Inspector General, George Opfer to reiterate the importance of this investigation and the high priority she places on attaining accurate and complete mental health care wait time data from the VA. At the Committee hearing last week, the VA witnesses said the Department would cooperate fully with the investigation requested by Senators Murray and Burr.

The full text of the Senators' letter follows:

December 6, 2011

The Honorable George J. Opfer

Inspector General Department of Veterans Affairs

801 I Street, NW

Washington, D.C. 20001

Dear Mr. Opfer,

We continue to hear from veterans about long wait times for VA mental health services. For that reason, the Committee held a hearing last week to discuss wait times and access to mental health care. While we understand that VA is in the midst of implementing new actions which build on the continuing transformation of mental health services to improve veterans' access to care, the Committee cannot properly evaluate the implementation unless provided with accurate information.

We write to request that your office conduct an audit of how accurately wait times for mental health services are recorded for both the initial visits and the follow-up appointments and determine if wait time data VA collects represent an accurate depiction of the veterans' ability to access those services. In addition, we ask that your office evaluate whether VA is accurately and completely reporting the data they collect. We have many questions about the overall implementation of mental health services at VA, but the most important is whether or not veterans can access the mental health care they need in a timely manner. Our request would build upon your previous work regarding wait lists for mental health care. At the Committee's recent hearing we requested that the Department cooperate fully with this audit, and they have agreed to do so.

воскресенье, 23 сентября 2012 г.

SENS. MURRAY, BURR ASK VA INSPECTOR GENERAL TO LAUNCH INVESTIGATION INTO MENTAL HEALTH CARE WAIT TIMES - US Fed News Service, Including US State News

WASHINGTON, Dec. 6 -- The Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee issued the following news release:

Today, U.

S. Senators Patty Murray (D-WA) and Richard Burr (R-NC), the Chairman and Ranking Member of the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, asked the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Inspector General to begin a formal audit of mental health care wait times at the VA. The call for action comes after a series of Senate hearings raised questions around the time it takes for veterans to receive an initial appointment and whether VA facilities are accurately reporting mental health care accessibility.

'We write to request that your office conduct an audit of how accurately wait times for mental health services are recorded for both the initial visits and the follow-up appointments and determine if wait time data VA collects represent an accurate depiction of veterans' ability to access those services,' the Senators wrote. 'In addition, we ask that your office evaluate whether VA is accurately and completely reporting the data they collect.'

The Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee has held two hearings this year on VA mental health accessibility. At the first hearing on July 14th the Committee heard the first-hand stories of two service members, who even after attempting to take their own lives, had appointments postponed and difficulties cutting through the red tape in order to get care. Then, just last week, the Committee heard from a VA psychologist and mental health care coordinator who testified about delays in providing mental health care treatment, including care for Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). That hearing also raised questions on whether VA providers where using techniques to ensure initial mental health care appointments fall within the VA's required 14 day window, without providing true access to care at those appointments. A survey of VA mental health providers requested by Senator Murray showed dramatically different results from the waiting time data that VA reports.

Senator Murray also called VA's Inspector General, George Opfer to reiterate the importance of this investigation and the high priority she places on attaining accurate and complete mental health care wait time data from the VA. At the Committee hearing last week, the VA witnesses said the Department would cooperate fully with the investigation requested by Senators Murray and Burr.

The full text of the Senators' letter follows:

December 6, 2011

The Honorable George J. Opfer

Inspector General

Department of Veterans Affairs

801 I Street, NW

Washington, D.

C. 20001

Dear Mr. Opfer,

We continue to hear from veterans about long wait times for VA mental health services. For that reason, the Committee held a hearing last week to discuss wait times and access to mental health care. While we understand that VA is in the midst of implementing new actions which build on the continuing transformation of mental health services to improve veterans' access to care, the Committee cannot properly evaluate the implementation unless provided with accurate information.

We write to request that your office conduct an audit of how accurately wait times for mental health services are recorded for both the initial visits and the follow-up appointments and determine if wait time data VA collects represent an accurate depiction of the veterans' ability to access those services. In addition, we ask that your office evaluate whether VA is accurately and completely reporting the data they collect. We have many questions about the overall implementation of mental health services at VA, but the most important is whether or not veterans can access the mental health care they need in a timely manner. Our request would build upon your previous work regarding wait lists for mental health care. At the Committee's recent hearing we requested that the Department cooperate fully with this audit, and they have agreed to do so.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this important request. We appreciate your work to ensure our nation's veterans are provided high quality care and timely services at VA and look forward to your report.

Sincerely,

Patty Murray Richard Burr

суббота, 22 сентября 2012 г.

FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF NON-PROFIT MENTAL HEALTH AGENCY PLEADS GUILTY TO EMBEZZLEMENT. - States News Service

CHARLOTTE, NC -- The following information was released by the United States Attorney's Office for the Western District of North Carolina:

Edward Gerard Payton Faces 20 Years in Federal Prison CHARLOTTE, NC - Edward Gerard Payton, 52, of Charlotte, NC, has entered a guilty plea today to knowingly and willfully converting without authority moneys, funds, property and assets of the non-profit community mental health agency he oversaw. Joining Anne M. Tompkins, U.S.Attorney for the Western District of North Carolina, in making today's announcement are Mark A. Morgan, Acting Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigations, Charlotte Division, and Jeaninne A. Hammett, Special Agent in Charge of the Internal Revenue Service-Criminal Investigation Division.

According to a two-count superseding bill of information, Payton embezzled and unlawfully converted at least $147,000 from Mecklenburg County Open Door (MOD), a non-profit community mental health agency in Charlotte which provides mental health services and housing to area mentally ill individuals. The criminal information charged Payton with embezzling and unlawfully converting monies and assets from the health care benefit program. Additionally, the superseding bill of information alleges that Payton used an MOD corporate credit card and automobile for his personal use, in violation of MOD policy. As part of his plea agreement, Payton has agreed that the total loss resulting from his criminal conduct at MOD was between $70,000 and $120,000 and that, as part of his criminal conduct, he abused his position of trust while employed at MOD. Payton faces a combined maximum term of 21 years in a federal prison, and a maximum fine of $350,000. He has also agreed to make full restitution to MOD and to the IRS for the tax years 2007-2009.

The investigation and prosecution of Payton is a product of the recently formed Health Care Fraud Task Force, a multi-agency team tasked with combating and eliminating health care fraud in the Western District of North Carolina. The work of the Task Force includes federal criminal prosecutions, such as the prosecution against Payton, and focuses on information sharing, following trends in health care fraud, staffing whistle blower complaints, and working specific investigations. It is made up of representatives from FBI, HHS Office of Inspector General, DEA, IRS, US Postal Inspection Service, US Secret Service, the NC Attorney General's Medicaid Investigations Unit, the NC Department of Insurance, and the NC State Bureau of Investigation. The Task Force is committed to building upon long standing law enforcement partnerships with the goal of successful prosecutions in order to reduce fraud and recover taxpayer dollars.

'As the Executive Director of MOD, Payton took advantage of the trust that was placed in him to run an agency that provides important services to our community. Today's guilty plea insures that Payton pays for abusiUnited States Attorneys Office - Western District of North Carolinang that trust for personal gain. It is also an important win in the fight against health care fraud in our District,' said U.S. Attorney Tompkins. 'Through the work of the Task Force, we will continue to investigate and prosecute health care fraud schemes and protect the integrity of our healthcare system against those who try to defraud it,' Tompkins added.

'Edward Payton not only took money, but he took away the faith of the mentally ill patients he was hired to help. The FBI will continue to work along side our law enforcement partners through the use of the Health Care Fraud Task Force to diligently go after fraudsters who would rather line their own pockets than use the money for those in need,' said Acting Special Agent in Charge Morgan, of the Charlotte Division of the FBI.

IRS-CI Special Agent Hammett stated, 'Health care fraud is a serious offense. Those who believe they can defraud the government and get away with it will find that they will be caught. IRS Criminal Investigation special agents along with their task force counterparts will seek out those who commit fraud and make sure they do not profit from their misdeeds.'

Greenville Mental Health Center - Design Cost Data

Greenville, South Carolina

Architect: Neal Prince + Partners Architects

The Greenville Mental Health Center is a facility of the South Carolina Department of Mental Health and provides quality mental health services to adults, children, adolescents, and their families. The South Carolina Department of Mental Health commissioned Neal Prince + Partners Architects to design the facility on the 3-acre-site of the former Greenville General Hospital. Through the consolidation of multiple services into one building, the department hoped to maximize square footage and cost efficiency.

The Greenville Area Mental Health Center is a two-story facility completed in January 2003. The building features administrative and medical offices for the agency; a 7,200-square-foot treatment area specifically for children with an exterior playground; counseling and evaluation areas for adolescents and adults; group therapy space; and a 2,000-square-foot multipurpose educational auditorium. In addition, the facility houses the agency's CRS services, which include a non-hospital indigent care program, counseling for the Greenville area's homeless population, and the Toward Local Care Program that provides care to those with persistent illness.

Neal Prince + Partners provided master planning, site design, building design, and interior design services. To accommodate the client's desire for a prairiestyle building, the architect responded with low pitched roof lines, large overhangs, and rich masonry detailing. Normal size brick veneer accentuate the building's prairie style elements. To increase cost efficiency, the building utilized a pre-fabricated panelized load bearing metal stud structural system with composite deck elevated concrete slabs. The metal roofing panels were selected for low maintenance and life cycle savings. The architect also used wood clad window expanses in appropriate locations as a day lighting strategy and to reinforce the prairie design.

The Greenville Area Mental Health Center allows the various mental health services to share parking, administrative, utility, and some lobby spaces, while keeping each of the mental health services compartmentalized. The building features an airy two volume main lobby with a separate children's lobby and play area. Bright colored furniture and the use of acoustical 'clouds' help clients feel at ease while breaking the 'stark' medical stereotype. In the administrative and office areas, greater efficiency was achieved through a central employee break room and a central filing location fitted with a movable file system. The Greenville Area Mental Health Center also features extensive landscaping with courtyards and sidewalks, allowed by the maximization of the parking layout. There are also separate entrances for the CRS and counseling clients.

The S.C. Department of Mental Health gives priority to adults, children, and their families affected by serious mental illnesses and significant emotional disorders. They believe that people are best served in or near their own homes or the community of their choice. As part of this mission, they also commissioned the Grcer Mental Health Center due to be completed in 2004 and also designed byNeal Prince + Partners Architects.

CONSTRUCTION TEAM

GENERAL CONTRACTOR: Choate Construction Co.

5960 Fairview Road, #500, Charlotte, NC 28210

STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:

Professional Engineering Associates, Inc.

RO. Box 8836, Greenville, SC 29604

ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL ENGINEER:

McCracken & Lopez, PA

P.O. Box 32515, Charlotte, NC 28232

LANDSCAPEARCHITECT: New Urban Concepts

1500 North Main Street, Greenville, SC 29609

COST ESTIMATOR: Conceptual Estimates

158 Pickering Drive, Murrells Inlet, SC 29576

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

SITE: 3.06 acres.

NUMBER OF BUILDINGS: One.

BUILDING SIZES: First floor, 27,406; second floor, 15,089; total, 42,495 square feet.

BUILDING HEIGHT: Floor to floor, 12'8''; total, 34'.

BASIC CONSTRUCTIONTYPE: New.

FOUNDATION: Poured in place concrete.

EXTERIORWALLS: Load bearing metal studs with brick veneer.

ROOF: Standing seam metal.

FLOORS: Carpet, VCT, tile, sports flooring.

INTERIORWALLS: Metal studs, drywall.

[Sidebar]

ARCHITECT

NEAL PRINCE + PARTNERS ARCHITECTS

110 W. North Street, Ste. 300

Greenville, SC 29601

www.neal-prince.com

FILE UNDER

MEDICAL

MD040726

пятница, 21 сентября 2012 г.

Racial variation in wanting and obtaining mental health services among women veterans in a primary care clinic - Journal of the National Medical Association

Epidemiologic studies suggest that African-American women may be less likely to obtain mental health services. Racial differences were explored in wanting and obtaining mental health services among women in an equal access primary care clinic setting after adjusting for demographics, mental disorder symptoms, and a history of sexual trauma. Participating in the study were women veterans at a primary care clinic at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Consecutive women patients (n = 526) between the ages of 20 and 49 years were screened for a desire to obtain mental health services. Patients were given the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders questionnaire (PRIME-MD) and a sexual trauma questionnaire. Mental health service utilization was monitored for 12 months. The median age of the women was 35.8 years; 54.4% of them were African-American. African-American women expressed a greater desire for mental health services than whites, yet mental health resources at the clinic were similarly used by both racial groups. African-American women may want more mental health services; however, given an equal access system, there were no racial differences in mental health use. (J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:231-236.)

Key words: women * veterans * utilization mental health services

Epidemiologic studies suggest that there may be racial differences in the use of outpatient mental health services. While African-American women are thought to be less likely to obtain mental health services than white women despite reported higher rates of mental illness, reasons for the possible discrepancy are not well developed.1,2 This relatively lower use of mental health services is typically attributed to access to care barriers such as cost and insurance coverage, decreased desire for services, and stigma associated with obtaining mental health services or attending a predominantly white clinic.

The main objective of this study was to measure potential racial variation in patients' desire for and actual receipt of mental health services in a women's health clinic. For the duration of this study, care for women veterans was free in our clinic, allowing the effect of cost and insurance coverage to be controlled. The clinic had equal proportions of African-American women and Caucasian women, thus minimizing the perception that care was available for only a select group. Finally, mental health care was provided during the same days, times, and in the same clinic location as gynecological care and primary medical care, therefore reducing the stigma of attending a 'mental health clinic.' In this study environment, we examined whether patients who have current symptoms of mental disorders would obtain mental health services independent of race.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Study Setting

The Women Veterans' Comprehensive Health Center (WVCHC) at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (DVAMC), Durham, NC opened in March, 1994 and is affiliated with Duke University Medical Center. Primary care, including general internal medicine, gynecology, and mental health services are available to women veterans who live within a 2-hour radius of the DVAMC. Additionally, specialty care in gynecology and breast cancer evaluation and treatment is offered to women veterans in the Southeastern states. The study was conducted from July 1, 1994 through December 31, 1996. During the first 3 years of clinic operation, which includes the study period, any woman veteran was eligible for care free of charge.

Patient Population

We administered a questionnaire that queries mental disorders and desire for mental health services to 528 consecutive women, ages of 20 to 49, on their initial visit to the WVCHC. Two women were excluded because they did not identify their race. Women were informed that the questionnaire was confidential, would not become part of their permanent medical record, and would be used to assess their medical care needs. Questionnaires were administered as part of an initial clinical assessment, and were then reviewed weekly by a team of mental health clinicians, including a clinical social worker, psychologist, and psychiatrist. Women who requested mental health services and women who reported symptoms of mental disorders were offered a mental health evaluation. Patients who had been referred to the center for specialty care from other VAMCs were excluded to ensure that patients in this study were presenting for primary care. Patients seeking primary care in the WVCHC were self-referred, having heard about the center from veterans' organizations and friends.

Data Instruments and Measures

On the initial visit questionnaire, the following demographic variables were measured: age, race, marital status, and education. We also administered the PRIME-MD questionnaire (PQ)3 and the Trauma Questionnaire (TQ).4 Additionally, to assess which patients wanted a mental health referral, the following question was included at the bottom of the survey: 'Would you like one of the Women's Mental Health Clinicians to review any concerns or active problems with you?'

The PRIME-MD questionnaire was developed by Pfizer, Incorporated, and was designed to help primary care physicians recognize common mental illnesses in their primary care practices.3 The PQ is a 1-page self-administered instrument consisting of 26 YES/NO questions about symptoms and/or signs present during the previous month. It is divided into five areas: mood, anxiety, somatoform, alcohol, and eating disorders. The questionnaire serves as an initial symptom screen for mental disorders and can be used with a 12-page clinician evaluation guide to aid in interpretation. The PQ is very specific (>80%) for four diagnoses commonly seen in primary care: depression, panic disorder, eating disorder, and alcohol abuse.3 When compared with other case-finding instruments for depression in primary care, the PQ is comparable to the Beck Depression Inventory, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Screen, and Zung Self-Assessment Depression Scale.3,5 The PRIME-MD uses the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders in either the III revised or IV edition as a criterion standard.6 The following variables were measured on the PQ survey instrument: 15 common physical symptoms, control over eating, depression, anxiety, panic, alcohol dependence, and overall health. Physical symptoms were counted, and divided into two groups. Women endorsing three or more symptoms were given a score of 1, and those endorsing fewer than three physical symptoms were given a score of 0. Each mental health symptom was scored as 1, indicating endorsement of the symptom, or as 0, indicating no symptoms (see Ref. 3 for more details).

The TQ was developed as part of a nationwide VA study to assess the history of lifetime trauma.6 The TQ has been used extensively at the VA National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and at VA Womens' Health Centers and validated compared to a clinician interview.4,7 Three questions were used from the TQ to measure early life sexual trauma, rape, and battering:

1. 'Were you ever sexually assaulted or touched in a sexual way by a person five or more years older than you when you were younger than 13?'

2. 'Have you ever had an experience where someone used force or the threat of force to have sexual relations with you against your will?'

3. 'At any time, has a partner, spouse or significant other ever actually hit you, kicked you, or physically hurt you in any way?' These questions were considered jointly as they are highly correlated.

Two orthogonal indicator variables were created. The first, Trauma 1, was scored as 1 if the individual had experienced exactly 1 type of traumatic event (rape, early rape, or battering) and as 0 otherwise. The second, Trauma 2, was scored as 1 if an individual experienced two or three of these events, and as 0 if none or one of these events occurred (see Ref. 4 for more details).

Utilization of mental health services in the VCHC was examined at the end of the 1996 calendar year, for the previous 12 months. Using the VA Decentralized Computerized Health Program (DHCP), we identified all women who used the mental health services. If a woman had at least one visit to any of the mental health providers, she was considered to have obtained mental health services. Wanting mental health help was scored as 1 if the individual indicated she wanted to review concerns or active problems raised on the questionnaire with a mental health clinician and as 0 if she did not want this review.

Statistical Analysis

Because the objective of this study was to measure potential racial variation in desire for and receipt of mental health services, we developed a clinical model and used logistic regression techniques to assess the association between trauma, physical symptoms, symptoms of depression, symptoms of an eating disorder, race, marital status, education, desire for mental health help, and utilization of mental health services.8 First, bivariate relationships were assessed, and then multivariate modeling was completed on the full clinical model using logistic regression.8 The full model did not include panic and anxiety because these variables were highly correlated with depression (p < 0.0001) and there were concerns of multicollinearity.

RESULTS

Overall patient demographic characteristics can be summarized as follows: the mean age was 35.8 years, 54.4% were African-American, 38.2% were currently married, and 25.1% were college graduates.

Initial analysis of the racial variation found that African-American and white women were not different in age distribution (Table 1). African-American women were less likely to be married (34% vs. 43%, p = 0.03) and to have completed college (21% vs. 30%, p = 0.02). There was no difference in distribution of mental disorder symptoms between the racial cohorts except African-American women were less likely to report alcohol problems, as assessed by a modified CAGE questionnaire, which is incorporated into the PQ (11% vs. 18%, p = 0.03). Although there were no significant differences between African Americans and whites, both groups reported high rates of somatic problems and anxiety. African-American women reported less trauma than white women (18% vs. 26%, p = 0.02). However, we found that African-American women wanted a mental health referral more frequently than white women (34% vs. 24%, p = 0.01). There were no differences in the proportions of African American and white women who actually obtained mental health services (31% vs. 27%, p = 0.31) (see Table 1).

In the multivariate model, race was not significantly associated with receipt of mental health services. Results from the adjusted logistic regression showed that desire for a mental health referral (p = 0.001), depressive symptoms (p = 0.0001), and endorsing two or more traumas (p = 0.0003) were significantly associated with obtaining mental health services (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

This study suggests that racial differences among women veterans exist in the desire for mental health services in bivariate analyses. Yet, after adjusting for mental disorder symptoms, a history of trauma, and a desire for mental health services, we found a trend toward African Americans seeking more services in the WVCHC. There were 44 African American (15.4% of all African American) women who requested mental health services and received it as compared to 25 whites (10.4% of all whites) women who requested mental health services and received it.

Although some studies have shown that AfricanAmerican women obtain less mental health services than other women,9-11 other studies have shown increased levels of use with office-based mental health practitioners and psychologists.12 One important question is whether financial barriers to care account for this. Although we did not find any significant racial differences in receipt of mental health services, this may be attributed to conducting the study within a VA medical center where financial barriers are less of an issue. Relatively little research has been conducted examining mental health utilization among women in VA medical centers, the largest fully integrated health care system in the U.S.13 Women veterans receive free health care at the WVCHC, including mental health services, in this equal access system. Our finding that there lacked a racial difference in seeking mental health care is similar to past studies that have noted that interethnic differences in mental health services use are the result of socioeconomic differences and are minimized when these factors are controlled.14,15 By showing that racial differences in use of outpatient psychiatric services do not differ in an equal access system, this study undermines explanations based on attitudinal factors intrinsic to specific ethnic groups.

There are additional factors that may potentially explain the lack of racial differences in use of mental health services. First, subjects were enrolled from the Durham VA WVCHC, which had equal proportions of African-American and white women. Second, mental health care was provided in the same clinic as other health care. Thus, the clinical study setting may have contributed to eliminating racial differences in mental health use by decreasing the stigma associated with seeking mental health services because mental health services were integrated into the primary care setting.

We found no significant racial differences in the endorsement of mental disorder symptoms such as depression and anxiety. In general, African-American women reported less trauma than white women. However, despite reporting less history of trauma and similar symptoms of mental illness, a greater proportion of African-American women indicated a desire for mental health services, and it appeared that African-American women were more likely to obtain mental health services (31% vs. 27%, p < 0.31) than whites. Additional research is needed to determine why, despite less endorsement of mental disorder symptoms, African-American women sought more mental health services.

In this study and other studies of mental health service utilization, service delivery itself, including its main constituents (practitioners, administrators, and policy makers), was omitted. Little is known about how factors such as 'clinic environment' and service availability affect the likelihood of wanting and obtaining outpatient mental health treatment among African-American and white women. Further studies are needed to examine this and to consider larger, representative samples of women veterans.

Prior studies that have examined racial differences in receiving mental health services have been problematic in that studies rarely examined gender issues when examining racial utilization of health care. That is, few studies have considered the interaction between race and gender. Women tend to seek more health care than men, but it is possible that African-American women are not much different than white women in terms of seeking mental health care when equal or destigmatized access is afforded.

There are several potential limitations to this study that need to be recognized. First, there are difficulties in screening for a history of trauma, because women may not have the same definition for what is traumatic. Nevertheless, the TQ is widely used throughout veterans hospitals, and validation studies have been performed.47 Additionally, the age range of the study, 20 to 49 years, is limited. This range encompassed the majority of women who are seen in the women's clinic and was predefined to investigate those women with a higher likelihood of having experienced trauma. In a crosssectional study, it is impossible to speculate about timing of events or draw causative inferences. Finally, given the large catchment area, it is unknown whether the women who wanted mental health help but did not seek help within this clinic, were receiving services in another setting. It is known that weekly mental health visits are impossible for some women in our catchment area due to long driving distances.

CONCLUSION

The goal of any health care practice should be to provide the best care possible to the patient. This means providing qualified clinicians and necessary equipment for provision of care. But delivering quality medical care also requires knowing the needs of the patients who will utilize the practice. The women veterans in this study are of particular interest as they are users of VA primary health care services and both whites and African Americans are equally represented. It is important in planning for mental health resources to ask whether or not they want the service. Additionally, once financial barriers and stigmas are removed, racial differences in utilization dissipate.

[Reference]

REFERENCES

[Reference]

1. Regier DA, Narrow WE, Rae DS, Manderscheid RW,, Locke BZ, Goodwin FK. The de Facto US mental and addictive disorders service system: Epidemiological Catchment Area prospective I-year prevalence rates of disorders and services. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1993;50:85-94.

2. Padgett DK, Patrick C, Burns BJ, Schlesinger HJ. Ethnic differences in use of inpatient mental health services by Blacks, Non-African-Americans, and Hispanics in a national insured population. Health Service Res. 1994;29:135-153.

3. Spitzer RL, Williams JBW, Kroenke K, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care: the Prime-MD 1000 study. JA4.1994;272:1749-1756.

4. McIntyre LM, Butterfield MI, Parsey K, et al. Validation of a trauma questionnaire in women veterans. J Gen Internal iMed. 1999;14:186-189.

[Reference]

5. Mulrow CD, Williams JW, Gerety MB, Ramirez G, Montiel OM, Kerber C. Case-finding instruments for depression in primary care settings. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:913-921.

6. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Revised Third Edition. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 1987.

7. Wolfe J. Trauma, traumatic memory, and research: where do we go from here? J Traumatic Stress. 1995;8:717-726. 8. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.

9. HuT, Snowden LR, Jerrell JM, et al. Ethnic population in public mental health: services choice and level of use. Amj Public Health. 1991;81:1429-1434.

10. Temkin-Greener H, Clark KT. Ethnicity, gender, and utilization of mental health services in a Medicaid population. Soc Sci Med. 1988;26:989-996.

11. Taube CA, Kessler LG, Burns BJ. Estimating the probability and level of ambulatory mental health service use. Health Service Res. 1986;Part 11:321-340.

12. Wood WD, Sherrets SD. Requests for outpatient mental health services: a comparison of Whites and Blacks. Comer Psychiatry. 1984;25:329-334.

13. Kizer KW. The 'New VA': a national laboratory for health care quality management. Am,JMed Qual. 1999;14:13-20. 14. Wells KB, Golding JM, Hough RL. Factors affecting

probability of use of general and medical health and social/ community services for Mexican Americans and non Hispanic Whites. Med Care. 1988;26:441-452.

15. Scheffler RM, Miller AG. Demand analysis of mental health service among ethnic subpopulations. Inquiry. 1989;26: 202-215.

[Author Affiliation]

Hayden B. Bosworth, PhD, Kelly S. Parsey MD, MHS, Marian 1. Butterfield, MD, MPH, Lauren M. McIntyre, MStat, PhD, Eugene Z. Oddone, MD, MHS, Karen M. Stechuchak, MS, and Lori A. Bastian, MD, MPH

Durham, North Carolina

[Author Affiliation]

четверг, 20 сентября 2012 г.

Reduce restraint use for mental-health patients. - ED Nursing

Reduce restraint use for mental-health patients

Do quick assessments

Adrienne Jones, RN, an ED nurse at Providence St. Vincent Medical Center in Portland, OR, says that ED nurses used to see about five to 10 mental-health patients a day, but are now seeing twice as many. ED nurses use these practices to decrease restraint use:

A medical screening examination, an examination by a social worker, and a safety assessment for patient and staff is done.

Each patient who presents to ED nurses with a mental-health complaint is asked, 'Have you had thoughts about hurting yourself or others,' 'Do you have a plan and/or means,' and 'Have you made previous suicide attempts or gestures?'

'Triage nurses should use clinical judgment, as they do in determining medical risk. Err on the side of caution,' says Jones.

Mental-health patients may present with medical issues, and may not be there for a mental-health issue, warns Jones. 'Their mental-health issue may distract you, and cause a serious medical issue to be missed,' she says.

A patient may have a headache, fever, or cough unrelated to the mental-health issue, she adds, and this can worsen a patient's mental-health crisis. 'When determining risk assessment and triage category, take into account the family's, caregiver's, and police account of the incident,' she says.

You may learn that your patient made previous suicide attempts, says Jones, or that he or she has a specific plan to harm himself or herself, such as carbon monoxide poisoning.

A SBARR form is used for ED mental-health patients.

'The form is used from the time they hit the door until disposition,' says Jones. 'It is updated as things change, much like the old kardex.' [A protocol for intoxicated patients in the ED is included.]

When a patient is handed over from triage to the primary nurse, the SBARR form is used, says Jones. 'The same information that the triage nurse has obtained needs to be passed to the primary nurse,' she says. 'When a patient is brought from triage, the handover must be done nurse to nurse.'

All ED nurses are trained in de-escalation of violent patients.

A four-hour class, Prevention and Management of Assaultive Behavior (PMAB), is given by mental-health nurses and technicians, and covers assessment, de-escalation techniques, and what to do if attacked by a patient, says Jones.

'Patients coming in who are currently violent are assessed prior to coming into the building,' says Jones. 'By emphasizing PMAB instead of a code gray, the mindset of those involved is to promote the least restrictive intervention possible.'

All mental health patients are dressed in green scrubs.

'The green scrubs alert all staff, including the doctors, that this patient is in the ED for mental-health issues,' says Jones. 'If we see a patient wandering the halls or attempting to go out of the ED, we can stop them before a crisis occurs, and get them back to their room.' (See related stories on medication administration and the patient's home medications, below.)

Source

For more information on restraint use in the ED, contact:

Adrienne Jones, RN, Emergency Department, Providence St. Vincent Medical Center, Portland, OR. Phone: (503) 216-2361. Fax: (503) 216-2330. E-mail: adrienne.jones@providence.org.

Fast assessment, meds can avoid restraints

Abigail Coffin, MSN, PMHNP-BC, ANP-BC, a psychiatric nurse practitioner in the ED at Duke University Hospital in Durham, NC, says that quick assessments and medication administration are two keys to avoiding restraint use.

'If the patient has a history of aggression, get the PRNs ready,' says Coffin. 'Offer [oral medications] first, so the patient feels some sense of control. If the [oral medication] is refused and the patient is agitated and dangerous to self or others, force intramuscular medications.'

Give medications immediately when a patient starts to become agitated, advises Coffin. 'If they cannot redirect themselves and calm down, there is no need to wait,' she says. 'I often see patients medicated well beyond the point of no return. Treat the agitation well before restraints are required.'

All of Duke's ED nurses have received training in de-escalation, and how to defend oneself if necessary from an aggressive patient, adds Coffin.'The number of restraints and seclusions has dropped dramatically,' she reports. 'We also do not require the use of our police nearly as much.'

Source

Abigail Coffin, MSN, PMHNP-BC, ANP-BC, Emergency Department/Psychiatric Evaluation Unit, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC. Phone: (919) 681-4402. E-mail: abigail.coffin@duke.edu.

Keep psychiatric patients on their home meds

If a psychiatric patient is being held in your ED, keep the patient on the medications he or she is supposed to be taking, advises Abigail Coffin, MSN, PMHNP-BC, ANP-BC, a psychiatric nurse practitioner in the ED at Duke University Hospital in Durham, NC.

'Often, the home meds are forgotten. Do not stop them because they are in the ED,' says Coffin. She adds that due to lack of available inpatient beds on psychiatric units in North Carolina, psychiatric patients can wait in the ED for up to a week.

If a schizoaffective patient is on [divalproex sodium] 1500 mg PO QHS and [risperidone] 2 mg PO QHS to control agitation, mania, and psychosis, for example, it is important to continue these medications and not miss doses, says Coffin.

Studies from University Medical Center Yield New Data on Mental Health.(Report) - Mental Health Weekly Digest

'Musculoskeletal complaints (MSC) are common among children, often persist into adolescence, and increase the risk of MSC in adulthood. Knowledge regarding determinants of MSC among children is limited,' investigators in Utrecht, Netherlands report (see also Mental Health).

'The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of MSC at age 11 years and to examine associations with sociodemographic factors, growth and development factors, mental health, tiredness, and lifestyle. Data from a Netherlands birth cohort study, the Prevention and Incidence of Asthma and Mite Allergy (PIAMA) Study (n = 2,638), were used (1996-2009). MSC were defined as complaints about the back, an upper extremity, a lower extremity, or any of these sites. Logistic regression analyses using a forward stepwise procedure were performed on multiply imputed data. The 1-year period prevalences of back, upper extremity, and lower extremity complaints that lasted at least 1 month were 2.8%, 4.8%, and 10.9%, respectively. Only poorer mental health was consistently associated with all 3 types of complaints. Poorer mental health, daytime tiredness, early pubertal development, being physically active at age 11 years, and weight-for-height z score were associated with having any MSC,' wrote G. Hulsegge and colleagues, University Medical Center.

The researchers concluded: 'This study showed that MSC, especially lower extremity complaints, are common among 11-year old-children and that only poorer mental health status is associated with MSC at all anatomic sites.'

Hulsegge and colleagues published their study in American Journal of Epidemiology (Musculoskeletal Complaints Among 11-Year-Old Children and Associated Factors. American Journal of Epidemiology, 2011;174(8):877-884).

For additional information, contact G. Hulsegge, University of Med Center Utrecht, Julius Center Health Science & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands.

The publisher of the American Journal of Epidemiology can be contacted at: Oxford University Press Inc., Journals Dept., 2001 Evans Rd., Cary, NC 27513, USA.

Keywords: City:Utrecht, Country:Netherlands, Region:Europe